The media is really making a big fuss about Kusanagi being
drunk. Some think he shouldn't have been arrested. Here's an article on it:
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D97OSKN81&show_article=1As students try to describe this incident, these words get used:
- drunk (adj, past participle v, n)
- drunker (comparative adj)
- drunkard (n)
The most common mistake is to say:
- × He was very drunker. (Drunker than what? What is he being compared to?)
- ○ He was very drunk. (He had consumed too much alcohol.)
A
drunkard (also called a
drunk) is someone who is always
drunk. They cannot stop drinking alcohol. We would probably call them alcoholics. The ex-finance minister Nakagawa was reported to have had alcohol problems in the past (
http://newsbizarre.com/2009/02/video-shoichi-nakagawa-drunk-at-g7-news.html), so some people might call him a
drunk. I haven't read similar reports about Kusanagi; we shouldn't call him a
drunk. However, we can use the comparative adjective to say:
- He was drunker than the police would allow.
- He was drunker than he should have been.
When you're drinking, be careful not to drink too much or get too
drunk. If you do, people might start calling you a
drunkard.
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿